Interpreting Your Report
Reading your EAC
Your EAC score summarizes how confidently assistants can find, cite, and recommend the business.
The score is a product-facing summary of observed assistant outcomes and supporting signals. It is not a keyword rank, a search traffic estimate, or a public recipe for platform behavior.
Score bands
| Band | Meaning | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| At risk | Assistants have low confidence or weak evidence. | Fix blockers first: crawler access, profile consistency, missing facts. |
| Needs work | The business is visible in some cases but unstable or under-supported. | Improve citation confidence, answerability, structured data, and authority. |
| Strong | Assistants can usually resolve, cite, and act on the business. | Monitor competitors, freshness, and prompt drift. |
How to read signal scores
Each signal points to a different failure mode. Do not treat the lowest number as automatically the only priority. Fix the signal that blocks the most valuable user outcomes first.
For example, a restaurant with stale hours should prioritize freshness before authority. A law firm with thin citations should prioritize citable facts and authority. A home-services business with blocked pages should fix crawler access before writing more content.
What needs fixing
The "What needs fixing" cards are designed to deep-link into playbooks. Each card should answer:
- What changed in the assistant read?
- Which signal is weak?
- Which page, profile, or source should be fixed?
- How do you verify that the answer changed?
Use the report as a loop
Fix one high-impact issue, re-run the check, and confirm the assistant answer moved before starting the next round.
Run scan